Login
Copyright (c) 2013 by JustJoking Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister
files/ JustJoking -- Blogmeister
justjoking's blog




by JustJoking teacher: Professor McGonagall


Assignments
Environment Systems 06/06
Track Meet 05/29
British Taxes, 1765! 05/22
Witch of Blackbird Pond 05/01
Links Around the World 04/23
This Moment Poem 04/14
Spring Break 04/14
Mtn School 03/20
Iditarod Links 02/26
Divided by 4 02/26
PhotoStory 02/11
Catapults 11/05
Book Title 10/31

Blog Entries
5/27 Long Weekend
5/22 No Taxation Without Representation
4/22 Around the World
4/15 This is the Moment
4/15 Spring Break
4/3 Cinqiain
3/20 Mountain school
2/26 Division problem
2/22 My photo story!
2/19 Iditarod Project
2/1 Story
1/22 Long Weekend
1/14 Photo Storie
1/9 Blogging Buddies
12/17 I am from
12/14 Top Ten T.V. Shows
12/6 Book Share
12/6 Super Read
12/4 Subtraction
12/3 Subtraction
11/30 Thanksgiving
11/30 Whittington
11/26 Favorite Dish
11/21 The tale of Despereanx
10/31 My Book
10/25 Top Ten Movies

List 25, 50, all

Conditions of Use


Revolutionary Taxes In 1662 King Charles granted a charter to Connecticut giving the colonists the rights to make their own laws (Speare, 70). 1787, King James wanted British Parliament to make laws for the colonists. Assemblies elected by the colonists made laws set taxes and raised companies of troops. Called militia to defend the colonists (Carter, 8).

In 1765, British Parliament could make more laws for the colonists. The King needed to pay for the French and Indian War so he made laws to tax the colonists (Harcourt, 266).

The King started the sugar act in 1764 (Harcourt, 272). “This tariff angered the colonists. But what bothered them the most was that they’d had no part in making this tax law” (Harcourt, 272). The King and Parliament all had a say in passing laws. “Unlike other British citizens, the colonists could not elect lawmakers … but Parliament was quick to remind colonists they were British subjects” (Harcourt, 263).

The Stamp Act was another blow to the colonists’ democratic ideals. The colonists had been practicing self- government for years (Harcourt, 263).

The Stamp Act of 1765 was another attempt by Parliament to get the colonists to pay the war debt. “The new tax law angered people in the colonies (January, 6). The Stamp Act required colonists to pay for a stamp (to show they paid the tax) on all paper goods like newspapers.

Parliament added these new laws to show they could still make laws for the colonists (Harcourt, 277). The Stamp Act Congress met to get the act repealed. Patriot James Otis said the famous quote, “No Taxation without Representation!” (Harcourt, 274). These British laws were directly against the democratic ideals of self-government the colonists had been practicing for 100 years.

The colonists did not get to elect representatives into British Parliament. They did not have any say in the tax laws they were being forced to pay. The King made a third law that angered the colonists, the tax on tea, 1773. The colonists believed in democracy (Harcourt, 263). The colonists were not represented in British Parliament and believed the only way to ensure their rights was to fight for them.

The colonists were British citizens living in America. When their rights were being trampled by The Sugar Act, The Stamp Act, and The Tax on Tea, they first appealed to the King and Parliament. When that didn’t work they protested. Eventually, the rally cry of “No taxation without representation” would lead the colonists to fight for their freedom. The colonists wanted a true representative government.

In 1776, in The Revolutionary War, British colonists fight Britain for the right to become American citizens and have freedom.

Refrences:

Carter, Alden. The American Revolution. New York: Franklin Watts, 1992.

Harcourt Brace. We The People; Early United States, Orlando: Harcourt Brace And company, 2000.

January, Brendan. The Revolutionary War. New York: Childrens press, 2000.

Maestro, Betsy. Liberty Or Death; The American Rrevolution-1763-1783.New York. Harper Collins Publishers, 2005.

Schanzer, Rosalyn. George vs. George; The American Revolution Seen From Both Sides. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2004.

Speare, Elizabeth George. The Witch of Blackbird Pond. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishers group Inc.,1958
From, Frodo




Article posted May 22, 2008 at 02:15 PM • comment • Reads 4825 • Return to Blog List

Add a Comment

Posted Comments


About the Blogger


Latest 10 Comments:
Hi my name is Jester
wow! that is very lo
Nice!!! Its very lon
Cool Poem! It's uniq
WOW COOL! <(^_^)>
Photo Storie is awes
hey i loved the whit
i like that cinqiain
Are you a good base
Hey JustJoking I'm j


Subscribe with Bloglines
Login
Copyright (c) 2013 by JustJoking Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister