Login
Copyright (c) 2014 by Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister
-- Blogmeister

Legolas's Blog-




by teacher: Professor McGonagall
Blog Entries
systems 06/06/08
Memorial Day Weekend 05/27/08
Tyranny In the colonies 05/22/08
world 04/24/08
random stuff 04/17/08
poem 04/15/08
poem 04/15/08
spring brake 04/14/08
poem 04/02/08
poem 04/02/08
Show All
poem 04/02/08
Mt.school 03/20/08
Iditarod project 02/20/08
Halo 3 02/12/08
Frienship and Bullying 02/05/08
week end 01/29/08
photo story 01/24/08
my long weekend 01/22/08
blog friend 01/09/08
spider 01/07/08
christmas 01/07/08
winter brake 12/20/07
game 12/19/07
poem 12/18/07
momo 12/14/07
cool cool beast 12/14/07
cool 12/14/07
fog Gregoe 12/13/07
sting ray 12/13/07
school 12/13/07
math 12/13/07
cooool beast 12/12/07
beastly/easy 12/03/07
legolas elf name 11/30/07
Heros dont run 11/29/07
skills 11/29/07
dish 11/29/07
my friend 11/28/07
thanks giving 11/20/07
milatary 11/16/07
wight tale 11/16/07
veterans day 11/14/07
7 random facks me. 10/26/07
Blogs 10/16/07
serves 10/09/07
no new water 09/26/07
Recess 09/18/07
week end 09/18/07
prime/composite 09/13/07
nick name 09/11/07

Revolutionary Taxes
In 1662 King Charles granted a charter to Connecticut giving the colonists the rights to make their own laws (Speare, 70). 1787, King James wanted British Parliament to make laws for the colonists. Assemblies elected by the colonists made laws set taxes and raised companies of troops. Called militia to defend the colonists (Carter, 8).

In 1765, British Parliament could make more laws for the colonists. The King needed to pay for the French and Indian War so he made laws to tax the colonists (Harcourt, 266).

The King started the sugar act in 1764 (Harcourt, 272). “This tariff angered the colonists. But what bothered them the most was that they’d had no part in making this tax law” (Harcourt, 272). The King and Parliament all had a say in passing laws. “Unlike other British citizens, the colonists could not elect lawmakers … but Parliament was quick to remind colonists they were British subjects” (Harcourt, 263).

The Stamp Act was another blow to the colonists’ democratic ideals. The colonists had been practicing self- government for years (Harcourt, 263).

The Stamp Act of 1765 was another attempt by Parliament to get the colonists to pay the war debt. “The new tax law angered people in the colonies (January, 6). The Stamp Act required colonists to pay for a stamp (to show they paid the tax) on all paper goods like newspapers.

Parliament added these new laws to show they could still make laws for the colonists (Harcourt, 277). The Stamp Act Congress met to get the act repealed. Patriot James Otis said the famous quote, “No Taxation without Representation!” (Harcourt, 274). These British laws were directly against the democratic ideals of self-government the colonists had been practicing for 100 years.

The colonists did not get to elect representatives into British Parliament. They did not have any say in the tax laws they were being forced to pay. The King made a third law that angered the colonists, the tax on tea, 1773. The colonists believed in democracy (Harcourt, 263). The colonists were not represented in British Parliament and believed the only way to ensure their rights was to fight for them.

The colonists were British citizens living in America. When their rights were being trampled by The Sugar Act, The Stamp Act, and The Tax on Tea, they first appealed to the King and Parliament. When that didn’t work they protested. Eventually, the rally cry of “No taxation without representation” would lead the colonists to fight for their freedom. The colonists wanted a true representative government.

In 1776, in The Revolutionary War, British colonists fight Britain for the right to become American citizens and have freedom.

Refrences:

Carter, Alden. The American Revolution. New York: Franklin Watts, 1992.

Harcourt Brace. We The People; Early United States, Orlando: Harcourt Brace And company, 2000.

January, Brendan. The Revolutionary War. New York: Childrens press, 2000.

Maestro, Betsy. Liberty Or Death; The American Rrevolution-1763-1783.New York. Harper Collins Publishers, 2005.

Schanzer, Rosalyn. George vs. George; The American Revolution Seen From Both Sides. Washington D.C.: National Geographic, 2004.

Speare, Elizabeth George. The Witch of Blackbird Pond. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishers group Inc.,1958
From, Frodo




Article posted May 22, 2008 at 02:15 PM • comment • Reads 261 • Return to Blog List
 
Add a Comment

The computer you are commenting from has an id number. It is 54.90.188.7!

Your Name:
E-mail:
URL of Your Blog
Your Comment:
Prove that you're a human!
Enter the letters & numbers in the box:


When your comment has been submitted, it will be delivered to the teacher, for approval. When it has been approved, the comment will be added to this author's blog.
Thank you!

About the Blogger

Login
Copyright (c) 2014 by Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister