Login
Copyright (c) 2014 by Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister
-- Blogmeister

were the awseomeness starts

Sixth grade Science students blogging from the Pacific Northwest in Chimacum, WA!
Mr. G's Blog
Mr. G's Science Facebook Page

by

teacher: Alfonso Gonzalez

Blog Entries

I think it won't because rock ist liveing there for it can't grow. It will erupt again. So over all i think it is inposible for it to be even close to how it was befor.
Article posted September 30, 2011 at 04:18 PM • comment (2) • Reads 108 • Return to Blog List
 
Add a Comment

The computer you are commenting from has an id number. It is 54.90.153.141!

Your Name:
E-mail:
URL of Your Blog
Your Comment:
Prove that you're a human!
Enter the letters & numbers in the box:


When your comment has been submitted, it will be delivered to the teacher, for approval. When it has been approved, the comment will be added to this author's blog.
Thank you!

Posted Comments

i don't mean it like that i mean that the rock it self won't grow
Posted November 4, 2011 at 08:00 PM by • jayme
Posted November 4, 2011 at 08:00 PM by • jayme
i disagree because mt.st.helens is a mountain which means it is capable of growing things on it and it's already starting to grow back in certain parts on it but if it blows up soon it probably will take twice as long to grow back.plus rocks grow moss and other stuff on it.So why can't mt.st.helens grow anything on it when rocks can grow things on it?
Posted October 19, 2011 at 04:16 PM by • halliet
Posted October 19, 2011 at 04:16 PM by • halliet
Login
Copyright (c) 2014 by Conditions of Use    Privacy Policy Return to Blogmeister